8 movie characters that were much better in books

When it comes to adapting stories from books to the big screen, readers are often disappointed by seeing how their favorite characters are portrayed in the films. However, in some incidences, the book adaptations do complete justice to the story and characters in the book. Here we list down some movie characters that were much better in books.

In film adaptations, Frankenstein’s monster is frequently portrayed as a silent being, communicating through primitive grunts and occasional brief words. However, in Mary Shelley’s novel, the monster possesses a remarkable ability for articulate speech and showcases intelligence. Yet, many people have agreed that Frankenstein’s monster has been aptly portrayed in the films.

In the books, Aragorn emerges as a self-assured hero-king, fully embracing his destined role. However, in the cinematic adaptations, Aragorn takes on a different persona. The movies portray him as plagued by self-doubt, driven by the need to prove himself, and therefore undergo a significant alteration to his character arc.

Victor Hugo’s novel ‘Les Misérables’ has been adapted in several forms– be it musicals or films, where significant changes have been made to the character of Marius. In the book, Marius is not officially considered a member of the student group. Attending just a single meeting, he experiences a crushing defeat in a debate and subsequently withdraws from further involvement, diverging from his portrayal in the adaptations.

The literary iteration of Forrest Gump differs greatly from the gentle and compassionate Tom Hanks portrayal seen on screen. In the novel, Forrest is characterized by anger and vulgarity. Unlike the movie version, he doesn’t undergo any significant personal growth or learn valuable life lessons.

In J.K. Rowling’s depiction, Snape is portrayed as a harsher and more acerbic character, often described as thin and reminiscent of a spider. He embodies the role of a double agent, adept at playing shadowy games and employing subtlety. Conversely, Alan Rickman’s portrayal of Snape in the movies presents a different demeanor. He is portrayed as extremely disciplined, composed, and dignified, exuding a cool and calculating aura.

Within the pages of the books, her character exudes a fiery spirit, refusing to tolerate mistreatment while remaining inherently good and intriguing. It is evident why Harry falls in love with her. However, in the movies, she is diminished to being solely Harry’s romantic interest, lacking any substantial depth of personality. Her portrayal becomes wooden and uninteresting.

In the books, Captain Antonio Corelli is depicted as a captivating and enchanting character, while in the movies, Nicolas Cage portrays him as a more comedic figure. Readers were highly disappointed with Captain Antonio Corelli’s character in the movies.

Within the novel, the character possesses courage and allure, and her departure serves as the primary storyline for the initial half of the book. However, in the movie adaptation, she is reduced to a mere obstacle standing between Laura Jean and Josh’s potential union.