[ad_1]
Croley, J. A., Reese, V. & Wagner, R. F. Dermatologic features of classic movie villains. JAMA Dermatol. 153, 559 (2017).
Google Scholar
Dion, K., Berscheid, E. & Walster, E. What is beautiful is good. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 24, 285–290 (1972).
Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Ashmore, R. D., Makhijani, M. G. & Longo, L. C. What is beautiful is good, but …: A meta-analytic review of research on the physical attractiveness stereotype. Psychol. Bull. 110, 109–128 (1991).
Google Scholar
Maestripieri, D., Henry, A. & Nickels, N. Explaining financial and prosocial biases in favor of attractive people: Interdisciplinary perspectives from economics, social psychology, and evolutionary psychology. Behav. Brain Sci. 40, e19 (2017).
Google Scholar
Klebl, C., Rhee, J. J., Greenaway, K. H., Luo, Y. & Bastian, B. Beauty goes down to the core: Attractiveness biases moral character attributions. J. Nonverbal Behav. 46, 83–97 (2022).
Google Scholar
Workman, C. I. et al. Morality is in the eye of the beholder: The neurocognitive basis of the “anomalous-is-bad” stereotype. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1494, 3–17 (2021).
Google Scholar
Hartung, F. et al. Behavioural and neural responses to facial disfigurement. Sci. Rep. 9, 8021 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jamrozik, A., Oraa, A. M., Sarwer, D. B. & Chatterjee, A. More than skin deep: Judgments of individuals with facial disfigurement. Psychol. Aesthet. Creat. Arts 13, 117–129 (2019).
Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 199–226 (2006).
Google Scholar
Mengelkoch, S., Gassen, J., Prokosch, M. L., Boehm, G. W. & Hill, S. E. More than just a pretty face? The relationship between immune function and perceived facial attractiveness. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 289, 11058 (2022).
Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L. & Marlowe, F. W. Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: Data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 274, 3113–3117 (2007).
Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Little, A. C. & Marlowe, F. W. Facial averageness and attractiveness in an isolated population of hunter-gatherers. Perception 36, 1813–1820 (2007).
Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M. et al. Re-evaluating the relationship between pathogen avoidance and preferences for facial symmetry and sexual dimorphism: A registered report. Evol. Hum. Behav. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2022.01.003 (2022).
Google Scholar
Schaller, M. & Park, J. H. The behavioral immune system (and why it matters). Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20, 99–103 (2011).
Google Scholar
Neuberg, S. L., Kenrick, D. T. & Schaller, M. Human threat management systems: Self-protection and disease avoidance. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 35, 1042–1051 (2011).
Google Scholar
Haselton, M. G., Nettle, D. & Murray, D. R. The Evolution of Cognitive Bias. in The Handbook of Evolutionary Psychology 1–20 (Wiley, 2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119125563.evpsych241.
Haselton, M. G. & Nettle, D. The paranoid optimist: An integrative evolutionary model of cognitive biases. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 10, 47–66 (2006).
Google Scholar
Zebrowitz, L. A. & Montepare, J. M. Social psychological face perception: Why appearance matters. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2, 1497–1517 (2008).
Google Scholar
Ryan, S., Oaten, M., Stevenson, R. J. & Case, T. I. Facial disfigurement is treated like an infectious disease. Evol. Hum. Behav. 33, 639–646 (2012).
Google Scholar
Shanmugarajah, K., Gaind, S., Clarke, A. & Butler, P. E. M. The role of disgust emotions in the observer response to facial disfigurement. Body Image 9, 455–461 (2012).
Google Scholar
Klebl, C., Greenaway, K. H., Rhee, J. J. & Bastian, B. Ugliness Judgments Alert us to Cues of Pathogen Presence. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550620931655 (2020).
Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D. & Griskevicius, V. Microbes, mating, and morality: Individual differences in three functional domains of disgust. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 97, 103–122 (2009).
Google Scholar
Tybur, J. M., Lieberman, D., Kurzban, R. & DeScioli, P. Disgust: Evolved function and structure. Psychol. Rev. 120, 65–84 (2013).
Google Scholar
Navarrete, C. D. & Fessler, D. Meat is good to Taboo: Dietary proscriptions as a product of the interaction of psychological mechanisms and social processes. J. Cogn. Cult. 3, 1–40 (2003).
Google Scholar
Danovitch, J. & Bloom, P. Children’s extension of disgust to physical and moral events. Emotion 9, 107–112 (2009).
Google Scholar
Haidt, J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion. (Vintage Books, 2012).
Krebs, D. The Origins of Morality (Oxford University Press, 2011). https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199778232.001.0001.
Google Scholar
Sanfey, A. G. The neural basis of economic decision-making in the Ultimatum Game. Science (80-.) 300, 1755–1758 (2003).
Google Scholar
Moll, J., Zahn, R., de Oliveira-Souza, R., Krueger, F. & Grafman, J. The neural basis of human moral cognition. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 6, 799–809 (2005).
Google Scholar
May, J., Workman, C. I., Han, H., Haas, J. & Han, H. The Neuroscience of Moral Judgment: Empirical and Philosophical Developments. in Neuroscience and Philosophy (eds. Sinnott-Armstrong, W. & De Brigard, F.) 17–47 (MIT Press, 2022). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/89jcx.
Chapman, H. A., Kim, D. A., Susskind, J. M. & Anderson, A. K. In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science (80-.) 323, 1222–1226 (2009).
Google Scholar
Cannon, P. R., Schnall, S. & White, M. Transgressions and expressions. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 2, 325–331 (2011).
Google Scholar
Molho, C., Tybur, J. M., Güler, E., Balliet, D. & Hofmann, W. Disgust and anger relate to different aggressive responses to moral violations. Psychol. Sci. 28, 609–619 (2017).
Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R. & Chapman, H. A. Beyond purity: Moral disgust toward bad character. Psychol. Sci. 28, 80–91 (2017).
Google Scholar
Giner-Sorolla, R., Kupfer, T. & Sabo, J. What makes moral disgust special? An integrative functional review. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 57, 223–289 (2018).
Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L. & Barrett, H. C. Cross-cultural evolutionary psychology. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 7, 92–97 (2016).
Google Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J. & Norenzayan, A. The WEIRDest people in the world? Behav. Brain Sci. 33, 61–83 (2010).
Google Scholar
Apicella, C., Norenzayan, A. & Henrich, J. Beyond WEIRD: A review of the last decade and a look ahead to the global laboratory of the future. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41, 319–329 (2020).
Google Scholar
Jaeger, B., Evans, A. M., Stel, M. & Beest, I. van. Who judges a book by its cover? Belief in physiognomy and reliance on trustworthiness impressions from faces. PsyArXiv Prepr. 1–19 (2019). https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/8dq4x.
Suzuki, A., Tsukamoto, S. & Takahashi, Y. Faces tell everything in a just and biologically determined world: Lay theories behind face reading. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 10, 62–72 (2019).
Google Scholar
Jones, B. C. et al. To which world regions does the valence–dominance model of social perception apply? Nat. Hum. Behav. 5, 159–169 (2021).
Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. Why the Hadza are Still Hunter-Gatherers. in Ethnicity, Hunter-Gatherers, and the “Other”: Association or Assimilation in Africa (ed. Kent, S.) 247–275 (Smithsonian Institution Press, 2002).
Weisz, J. R. East African medical attitudes. Soc. Sci. Med. 6, 323–333 (1972).
Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. W. The Hadza: Hunter-Gatherers of Tanzania. (University of California Press, 2010).
Ayeni, O. A., Ayeni, O. O. & Jackson, R. Observations on the procedural aspects and health effects of scarification in sub-Saharan Africa. J. Cutan. Med. Surg. 11, 217–221 (2007).
Google Scholar
Singh, D. & Bronstad, M. P. Sex differences in the anatomical locations of human body scarification and tattooing as a function of pathogen prevalence. Evol. Hum. Behav. 18, 403–416 (1997).
Google Scholar
Smith, K. M. & Apicella, C. L. Partner choice in human evolution: The role of cooperation, foraging ability, and culture in Hadza campmate preferences. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41, 354–366 (2020).
Google Scholar
Smith, K. M. & Apicella, C. L. Hadza hunter-gatherers disagree on perceptions of moral character. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 11, 616–625 (2020).
Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L., Azevedo, E. M., Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. Evolutionary origins of the endowment effect: Evidence from hunter-gatherers. Am. Econ. Rev. 104, 1793–1805 (2014).
Google Scholar
Apicella, C. L. High levels of rule-bending in a minimally religious and largely egalitarian forager population. Religion. Brain Behav. 8, 133–148 (2018).
Google Scholar
Stagnaro, M. N., Stibbard-Hawkes, D. N. E. & Apicella, C. L. Do religious and market-based institutions promote cooperation in Hadza hunter-gatherers? Relig. Brain Behav. (2022).
Tovee, M., Swami, V., Furnham, A. & Mangalparsad, R. Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 443–456 (2006).
Google Scholar
Bissell, K. L. & Chung, J. Y. Americanized beauty? Predictors of perceived attractiveness from US and South Korean participants based on media exposure, ethnicity, and socio-cultural attitudes toward ideal beauty. Asian J. Commun. 19, 227–247 (2009).
Google Scholar
Marlowe, F. W. Hunter-gatherers and human evolution. Evol. Anthropol. Issues News Rev. 14, 54–67 (2005).
Google Scholar
Cushman, F. Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 6, 97–103 (2015).
Google Scholar
Hartman, R., Blakey, W. & Gray, K. Deconstructing moral character judgments. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 43, 205–212 (2022).
Google Scholar
Helzer, E. G. et al. Agreement on the perception of moral character. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 40, 1698–1710 (2014).
Google Scholar
Curtin, C. M. et al. Kinship intensity and the use of mental states in moral judgment across societies. Evol. Hum. Behav. 41, 415–429 (2020).
Google Scholar
Barrett, H. C. et al. Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 113, 4688–4693 (2016).
Google Scholar
Smith, K. M. & Apicella, C. L. Hadza hunter-gatherers are not deontologists and do not prefer deontologists as social partners. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 101, 104314 (2022).
Google Scholar
Gray, P. B. & Marlowe, F. Fluctuating asymmetry of a foraging population: The Hadza of Tanzania. Ann. Hum. Biol. 29, 495–501 (2002).
Google Scholar
Jones, N. B. Demography and Evolutionary Ecology of Hadza Hunter-Gatherers. (Cambridge University Press, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107707030.
Sznycer, D. & Patrick, C. The origins of criminal law. Nat. Hum. Behav. 4, 506–516 (2020).
Google Scholar
Hill, K. R., Wood, B. M., Baggio, J., Hurtado, A. M. & Boyd, R. T. Hunter-gatherer inter-band interaction rates: Implications for cumulative culture. PLoS ONE 9, e102806 (2014).
Google Scholar
Smith, K. M., Larroucau, T., Mabulla, I. A. & Apicella, C. L. Hunter-gatherers maintain assortativity in cooperation despite high levels of residential change and mixing. Curr. Biol. 28, 3152-3157.e4 (2018).
Google Scholar
Workman, C. I. & Chatterjee, A. The face image meta-database (fIMDb) & ChatLab facial anomaly database (CFAD): Tools for research on face perception and social stigma. Methods Psychol. 5, 100063 (2021).
Google Scholar
Kramer, R. S. S., Jenkins, R. & Burton, A. M. InterFace: A software package for face image warping, averaging, and principal components analysis. Behav. Res. Methods 49, 2002–2011 (2017).
Google Scholar
Tiddeman, B., Burt, M. & Perrett, D. Prototyping and transforming facial textures for perception research. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 21, 42–50 (2001).
Google Scholar
McElreath, R. Statistical Rethinking. Statistical Rethinking (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315372495.
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A. & Lüdecke, D. Indices of effect existence and significance in the Bayesian framework. Front. Psychol. 10, 1125 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. K. & Liddell, T. M. The Bayesian new statistics: Hypothesis testing, estimation, meta-analysis, and power analysis from a Bayesian perspective. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 25, 178–206 (2018).
Google Scholar
Kruschke, J. K. Rejecting or accepting parameter values in bayesian estimation. Adv. Methods Pract. Psychol. Sci. 1, 270–280 (2018).
Google Scholar
Bürkner, P.-C. brms: An R package for Bayesian multilevel models using stan. J. Stat. Softw. 80, 1–28 (2017).
Google Scholar
Gabry, J. & Cesnovar, R. cmdstanr: R Interface to ‘CmdStan’. (2020).
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse. J. Open Source Softw. 4, 1686 (2019).
Google Scholar
Kay, M. tidybayes: Tidy data and geoms for Bayesian models. R package version 3.0.0 (2021) https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1308151.
Wickham, H. modelr: Modelling Functions that Work with the Pipe. (2020).
[ad_2]
Source link