[ad_1]
Global Burden of Disease Collaborative Network. Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019 (GBD 2019). [Internet]. Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation. Available at: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool
Belda-Lois, JM et al. Gait rehabilitation after stroke: a review towards a top-down approach. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitated. 8(1), 1–20 (2011).
Google Science
Flansbjer, UB, Holmbäck, AM, Downham, D., Patten, C. & Lexell, J. Reliability of gait tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J. Rehabil. with 37(2), 75–82 (2005).
Geich, S. et al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. J. Rehabil. with 36135–141 (2004).
Google Science
Hill, K. et al. Balance and mobility outcomes in stroke patients: a comprehensive audit. Aust. J. Physiother. 43173–180 (1997).
Park, J., Lee, SU & Jung, SH Prediction of functional mobility after stroke from initial assessment of cognitive function. Neuro rehabilitation. 41(1), 169–177 (2017).
Google Science
Bohannon, RW, Andrews, AW & Smith, MB Rehabilitation goals of patients with hemiplegia. Internal J. Rehabil. Res. 11(2), 181–184 (1988).
Google Science
Kramer, S., Johnson, L., Bernhardt, J. & Cumming, T. Energy expenditure and cost during walking after stroke: a systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilitated. 97(4), 619–632 (2016).
Carr, JH & Shepherd, RB Rehabilitation after stroke – Exercise and training guidelines to optimize motor skillsFirst Edition (2003).
Pollock, A., St George, B., Fenton, M. & Firkins, L. Top 10 research priorities related to life after stroke. Lancet Neurol. 11(3), 209 (2012).
French, B., Thomas, LH, Coupe, J., McMahon, NE, Connell, L., Harrison, J., Sutton, CJ, Tishkovskaya, S. & Watkins, CL Repetitive task training to improve functional abilities after a stroke. Cochrane Database System. Rev. 11 (2016).
Veerbeek, JM et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. FLOOR ONE 9(2), e87987 (2014).
Bruni, MF et al. What the best evidence tells us about robotic gait rehabilitation in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Neurosci. 1(48), 11–17 (2018).
Google Science
Mehrholz, J., Thomas, S., Kugler, J., Pohl, M., & Elsner, B. Electromechanically assisted walking training after stroke. Cochrane Database System. Rev. 10 (2020).
Calabro, RS et al. Shaping neuroplasticity using powered exoskeletons in stroke patients: a randomized clinical trial. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitated. 15(1), 1–6 (2018).
Google Science
Rehme, AK, Eickhoff, SB, Rottschy, C., Fink, GR & Grefkes, C. A meta-analysis of activation likelihood assessment of motor-related neural activity after stroke. Neurotype 59(3), 2771–2782 (2012).
Coleman, ER et al. Early rehabilitation after stroke: A narrative. Curr. Atherosclerosis. Representative 19(12), 1–2 (2017).
Google Science
Jorgensen, HS et al. Outcome and recovery time in stroke. Part I: Result. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilitated. 76(5), 399–405 (1995).
Kreisel, SH, Hennerici, MG & Bäzner, H. Pathophysiology of rehabilitation after stroke: The natural course of clinical recovery, use-dependent plasticity and rehabilitation outcome. Cerebrovasc. dis. 23(4), 243–255 (2007).
Laparidou, D. et al. Patient, caregiver and staff perceptions of robotics in motor rehabilitation: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitated. 18(1), 1–24 (2021).
Google Science
Danzl, MM, Chelette, KC, Lee, K., Lykins, D. & Sawaki, L. Brain stimulation combined with a novel locomotor training with a robotic gait orthosis in chronic stroke: a feasibility study. Neuro rehabilitation. 33(1), 67–76 (2013).
Google Science
Vaughan-Grum, J. et al. Exoskeleton use in gait rehabilitation after stroke: A qualitative study of the perspectives of stroke survivors and physiotherapists. J. Neuroeng. Rehabilitated. 17(1), 1–5 (2020).
Google Science
Louie, MD et al. Patients’ and therapists’ experiences and perceptions of exoskeleton-based physiotherapy during subacute stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative analysis. Disabled. Rehabilitated. 201–9 (2021).
Google Science
Goffredo, M. et al. A ground-powered exoskeleton for gait training in subacute stroke patients: Clinical and gait evaluations. Euro. J. Phys. Rehabilitated. Med. 55(6), 710–721 (2019).
Molteni, F. et al. Gait rehabilitation with an overhead powered exoskeleton: a randomized controlled trial in subjects with subacute stroke. Brain Sci. 11(1), 104 (2021).
Meseguer-Henarejos, AB, Sanchez-Meca, J., Lopez-Pina, JA & Carles-Hernandez, R. Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the modified Ashworth scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Euro. J. Phys. Rehabilitated. Med. 54(4), 576–590 (2017).
Gandola, M. et al. An automatic tuning procedure for exoskeleton-assisted overground gait: Proof of concept for the stroke population. In front. Neurobot. 121–11 (2018).
Google Science
Holmberg, C., Judith, G. & Nicki, T. Qualitative methods in health research. in Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative social research 2006 March 31, Flight. 7, no. 2 (2004).
Cohen, JW Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1988 (Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988).
Google Science
Freitas, S., Simões, MR, Alves, L. & Santana, I. Montreal Cognitive Assessment: A validation study for mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimer’s Dis. Ph.D. Disorder. 27(1), 37–43 (2013).
Demeyere, N., Riddoch, MJ, Slavkova, ED, Bickerton, WL & Humphreys, GW The Oxford Cognitive Screen (OCS): Validation of a brief stroke-specific cognitive screening tool. psychol. Appreciate. 27(3), 883 (2015).
Bodien, YG, Carlowicz, CA, Chatelle, C. & Giacino, JT Sensitivity and specificity of the Revised Coma Recovery Scale total score in detecting conscious awareness. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilitated. 97(3), 490–492 (2016).
Mehrholz, J., Wagner, K., Rutte, K., Meiβner, D. & Pohl, M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabilitated. 88(10), 1314–1319 (2007).
Swank, C., Sikka, S., Driver, S., Bennett, M. & Callender, L. Feasibility of integrating robotic exoskeleton gait training into inpatient rehabilitation. Disabled. Rehabilitated. assistant tech. 15(4), 409–417 (2020).
Read, E., Woolsey, C., McGibbon, CA & O’Connell, C. Physiotherapists’ experiences of using the Ekso bionic exoskeleton with patients in a neurological rehabilitation hospital: A qualitative study. Rehabilitated. Res. Pract. 82020 (2020).
Google Science
Mortenson, WB, Pysklywec, A., Chau, L., Prescott, M. & Townson, A. Therapists’ experience of exoskeleton training and application in a rehabilitation center. Disabled. Rehabilitated. 91–7 (2020).
Google Science
Hidler, JM & Wall, AE Changes in muscle activation patterns during robot-assisted walking. Clin. Biomech. 20(2), 184–193 (2005).
Google Science
Kressler, J., Wymer, T. & Domingo, A. Respiratory, cardiovascular and metabolic responses during different modes of overground bionic ambulation in individuals with motor-incomplete spinal cord injury: A case series. J. Rehabil. with 50(2), 173–180 (2018).
Thomassen, GK, Jørgensen, V. & Normann, B. ‘Back on the same level as everyone else’ – User perspectives on walking with an exoskeleton, a qualitative study. Spinal Cord Ser. Cases 5(1), 1–7 (2019).
Google Science
Swank, C., Wang-Price, S., Gao, F. & Almutairi, S. Walking with a robotic exoskeleton does not mimic natural gait: a within-subject study. JMIR Rehabil. assistant tech. 6(1), e11023 (2019).
Deluca, A. et al. An exoskeleton for gait rehabilitation: Effects of assistance, mechanical structure, and walking aids on muscle activations. App Sci. 9(14), 2868 (2019).
Google Science
Garcia-Cosio, E. et al. Decoding sensorimotor rhythms during robotic treadmill walking for brain computer interface (BCI) applications. FLOOR ONE 10(12), e0137910 (2015).
[ad_2]
Source link