[ad_1]
Prince Harry’s “self-destructive” behavior could be influenced by post-traumatic stress disorder, according to a retired colonel who also suffered from the condition.
Philip Ingram said he recognized many of his former traits in the Duke’s behavior and that he physically “shuddered” when he saw some of his recent interviews.
“A lot of the behaviors I see in Prince Harry are almost triggers for me,” the army veteran, who served for 26 years and retired as a colonel, told Sky News.
“They remind me of some of my behaviors when I was suffering from pretty bad PTSD.
“I see a troubled person and a person who needs help, not someone who needs to be constantly criticized for the way they behave.”
It comes after a series of revealing leaks from Prince Harry’s upcoming book, Spare, in which he made claims including that his brother assaulted him and that he killed 25 Taliban in Afghanistan.
Mr Ingram said he spoke to Harry several times at a ball when he graduated from Sandhurst Military Academy and that he had a “spark in his eye, a confidence”.
However, he now believes the prince is “falling apart” and needs to be protected.
“In what’s in his eyes, in his demeanor, in what he says – and the way he says things… What I see in him is what I call self-destructive behavior – which is a recognized symptom of PTSD,” Mr. Ingram said.
The retired colonel said he believes Prince Harry is not seeking revenge and may not be fully aware of how he is behaving.
“He’ll never know until something crosses that threshold and he goes to himself and says ‘that’s not me,'” Mr Ingram said.
A royal expert said Harry’s claims were the “most sensational royal revelations” in almost 30 years and would “shake the foundations” of the monarchy.
Michael Cole said Duke of Sussex had “detonated a huge anti-personnel mine” under Buckingham Palace.
Mr Cole, a former spokesman for ex-Harrods owner Mohammed Al-Fayed, told Sky News: “This is the most sensational and damaging set of royal revelations since Prince Harry’s mother, the late Princess Dayanasat down with now-disgraced BBC Panorama reporter Martin Bashir in November 1995.
“Prince Harry in this book doesn’t actually blow up the doors of Buckingham Palace, he blows up a huge land mine underneath it and shakes the royal building and really shakes the British establishment.”
Michael Cole said the situation was in some ways ‘tragic’
“These are very serious allegations and they cannot always be ignored.
“It’s tragic in many ways that he feels he has to record this way, but he clearly does, and no one can say he didn’t pull his punches because he let them.”
Among Harry’s claims are these Prince William knocked him to the floor during an argument in which he landed on a dog bowl.
He also claimed that he and his brother asked their father, King Charlesnot to marry camel after Diana’s death.
Mr Cole said: “Allegations of this nature should be resolved within the family. Families do have disagreements, this can’t be the first family in the world where a newcomer has caused conflict.”
“Admitting you’re taking cocaine is a big mistake”
Prince Harry also makes a number of personal revelations in the book, including that he took cocaine and marijuana and lost his virginity in a field.
“I think he made some big mistakes in that book,” Mr. Cole said.
Prince Harry in Helmand Province, southern Afghanistan in 2008
“Admitting that I was taking cocaine was a big mistake, a big mistake.
“I think it’s a mistake to plead guilty to a crime like this and also to give his personal toll on the people he killed in Afghanistan.”
Read more:
The biggest revelations from Spare
William will be furious – and there’s more to come
“It goes against the soldier’s code in every way and I’m sure his colleagues won’t thank him for it.”
“He has painted a target on his back with this. He raised the level of danger for his entire family.”
Harry has ‘fully embraced the trade’
The book, published by Penguin Random House but coincidentally released early in Spain this week, follows the release of the Netflix series Harry and Meghan.
The pair have a deal with the US streaming giant reportedly worth tens of millions of pounds.
The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have expressed their desire to become ‘financially independent’ following their decision to do so retired from front-line royal duties in January 2020
Prince Harry and his wife Meghan in their latest Netflix series
And Mr Cole said Prince Harry had now “fully embraced the trade”.
He said: “His royal status is just a calling card and from now on he and his wife are in the money business.
“It’s hard for me to sympathize with them because they are two beautiful, beautiful people with two wonderful children and lots of money… it’s not a bad existence and while some of these complaints are serious, a lot of them are very trivial.
“They obviously feel they have to be outspoken, but that means the end of their previous existence.”
Coronation invitation ‘problem’
Buckingham Palace and Kensington Palace have so far declined to comment on the claims in the book.
They will be lined up for more coverage in the coming days, with Prince Harry giving several interviews to promote the book.
It’s a key question will he attend his father’s coronation, should be held in May.
Click to subscribe to Sky News Daily wherever you get your podcasts
In an interview with ITV, Prince Harry said: “There are a lot of things that can happen between now and then. But you know, the door is always open. The ball is in their court.
“There’s a lot to discuss and I really hope they’re willing to sit down and talk about it.
Mr Cole said the issue was “a problem” for Harry and Meghan.
He said: “The King has made it clear they will be welcome at his coronation but this is proving to be a problem.
“If they accept and come, it leaves them open to allegations of hypocrisy and if they decline the invitation, they will look quite petty and quite petty and there will be extra pressure on Prince Harry because all the royal princes are in attendance at the Abbey.” on the day of the coronation and will have to take an oath of loyalty to the new king.
“The King has played this quite well and makes it clear that his second son is no outcast in his opinion.”
[ad_2]
Source link